HOME
MARKET PLACE
GALLERY/MEDIA
NEWS
COOL RIDES
CASHIER
ESPANOL
CONTACT US
ADVERTISING RATES

Welcome you are Visitor

Hit Counter

Last Update 12/23/10

MAC exhaust

BBK Performance

Power Stop Cross drilled and slotted rotors

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 Which pony is for you? Great question, this is what we asked ourselves so we put it to the test.

 

 

 

 

Recently the editor of www.netstang.com, our sister site, Dave Stevenson and I got into a discussion regarding the Fox body Mustang and the SN95's. In our conversation we could not come up with a conclusion as to what car was the best bang for the buck. You can buy a $25,000 '01 Cobra or buy a $5,000 fox Mustang invest another $8,000 and get similar  results...but are they the same?

We decided to do our own research and driving impressions. The comparison would have to range from daily driver abilities to performance comparisons. With the assistance of a G-Tech we would get some data use-full for the technical aspect of this story.

THE CARS Netstang.com - '89 Mustang GT converible vs. online-racer.com - '01 Cobra.
The first step was to create a base line for comparing both cars. We did a canyon run to get a feel for acceleration and handling characteristics of both cars. 

COBRA PERFORMANCE SPECS

Stock 5 speed w/ 3.27:1 gears

Acceleration 0-60 mph - 4.8 seconds
1/4 mile - 13.5 @ 105
Braking 70 -0 mph - 179 feet
Skid pad - .89 g

1989 GT PERFORMANCE SPECS

(before any modifications)
 Stock 5 speed w/2.73:1 gears
Acceleration 0-60 mph - 6.2 seconds
1/4 mile - 14.9 @ 93
Braking 80 -0 mph - 289 feet
Skid pad - .80 g
Driving Impressions - Ed Inclan
I have been a big Mustang fan ever since I can remember. Modifying and restoring these cars have cost me a fortune (although fun!) I found that a great base line car would be a Cobra. When I first purchased the car I did not know about the '03 Cobra or I probably would have waited. (click here to see some of my cars)

I figured that upgrading any other car so it would perform like a Cobra would be expensive. I could actually install a roll cage and race the car as is.

The Cobra is very docile compared to the fox platform, due to its independent rear suspension. Although some may argue that solid live axle makes for a much better race car I like to think that the IRS may have much more potential. If you look at all the fastest GT cars such as BMW, Corvette, Porsche, etc they all have IRS! So I think its only a matter of time before some of the suspension designers find the perfect combo. 

Following is a driving impression from Dave Sevenson who favors the fox platform.

Driving Impressions - by Dave Stevenson

The Netstang Project car began life as a 1989 GT Convertible 5 speed with 2.73:1 gears (axle code: M) out back.  Power and Torque ratings were at 225 hp @ 4,400 RPM’s and 300 lb-ft @ 3,000 RPM’s respectfully.  Right off the showroom floor this fully loaded GT listed for $18,914 and could blast through the ¼ mile in less than 15 seconds.

 Fast-forward to 1999, Netstang Editor Dave Stevenson picked up the car used for $5,200. His intention was to build this car into a very capable daily driver and post the ongoing build up on Netstang.com.  The goal of the project was to modify the car for the street, strip and road course, while remaining totally street and emissions legal.  In a completely bone stock state, this car could cover the ¼ mile in 14.9 seconds @ 93 MPH.  Some minor modifications including a swap to 3.27:1 rear gears, a performance cat back and a K&N air filter pushed this car well into the mid 14’s.

 Similar 87-93 Fox platform 5.0 cars can be found much cheaper and in the lighter hatch or notch back body styles.  It’s not uncommon to find a strong and decent looking 5.0 in the $2,000-$3000 price range.  If you don’t mind dropping in a new engine, some Fox platform cars can be found dirt-cheap.  Just ask some racers at the local drag strip or road course, chances are their Mustang racecars began life as a four or six cylinder commuter car.

 The Netstang project car spends a lot of time cruising the streets and carving the canyons of Southern California.  For this reason, they chose the open-air characteristics of the convertible body style.  If the project were an all out racer, a hatch or notch back 5.0 would have been much cheaper and lighter.  A basic rule of thumb is every 100 lbs is good for a tenth in the ¼ mile.  When building Fox platform racers, the notch back sedan is the lightest and best suited for dragging or low speed road racing. The lightweight sedan allows better acceleration with the added benefit of a stiffer chassis.  The hatch back may be a little heavier and not as tight as the notch but the better drag coefficient associated with it’s “fast back” design allows it an advantage in top speed racing events like the Silver State Challenge.

 When comparing the stock 87-93 Fox Platform 5.0’s to the stock 94-98 SN95 Platform V-8’s, it’s safe to say that the straight-line performance is very similar, with the edge going to the Fox but that’s where it ends. Braking, handling and chassis rigidity in the SN95’s is far superior to the Fox it replaced.  Performance wise, the only down side to the new platform was that it was a slightly larger and heavier platform. 

 

 With the introduction of the 1999 SN95’s, straight-line performance got a huge boost by a power increase to 260 HP in the GT and 320 HP in the Cobra. In addition to being much more powerful, the new Cobra also sports a trick Independent Rear Suspension. Unique to the Cobra, this IRS system allows the Cobra a smoother ride and better performance abilities over the stock GT live axle set up.  With standard Traction Control and a suspension that actually helps reduced unsprung weight, the latest Mustang flagship can do it all.

 What could we do to our old school Fox platform Project to bring the performance up to par with a new SN95 platform Mustang?  Better yet, let’s modify this Fox body to compete against a 2001Cobra while maintaining decent ride quality, every day reliability and total emissions legality.

 We’ll approach this Project in two steps, first we’ll modify the suspension, intake and exhaust to bring the 1989 Netstang Project’s performance up to the level of a stock 1999 and up 260 HP SN95.    This will give the average performance enthusiast and idea of what can be done with the typical bolt-ons.  In the second step, we’ll install an emissions legal Stroker engine to bring power levels into the 99 and up Cobra Zone.  Once the engine is dialed in, we’ll put the modified Netstang Fox Body up against the stock Online-Racer 2001 Cobra at the track.  We’ll measure performance statistics and do driving impressions on both the vehicles.

So... based on all that data, what's your choice? What do you think is the best bang for the buck?
Send your vote to: edward@online-racer.com 

PART 2

 

  HOME   CLASSIFIEDS   MARKET PLACE & USED PARTS   RACING STORY INDEX    GALLERY    CONTACT US    PEOPLE IN RACING    FORUMS     FAST CARS    CASHIER   ONDAS EN ESPANOL ADVERTISE WITH US